Back to Blog

Engineering Manager Hiring Decisions at 10–20 Engineers: Stage-Specific Operating Models

Success = less founder time in standups and 1:1s, steady sprints, and no surprise delivery misses in the first 90 days.

Posted by

TL;DR

  • Once you hit 10–20 engineers, your first engineering manager needs to shift away from player-coach work and actually coordinate teams - think managing 2–3 workstreams, not writing code themselves.
  • The hiring decision hinges on whether the candidate can own sprint planning, clear blockers, and keep delivery on track while founders focus on architecture and product.
  • Main trade-off: hire for process chops and people growth, not just deep technical skills - big technical calls still go to founders or technical leadership.
  • Watch out for: senior ICs who won't delegate, or ex-managers from 100+ orgs who drown the team in process before you even have basics in place.
  • Success = less founder time in standups and 1:1s, steady sprints, and no surprise delivery misses in the first 90 days.

An engineering manager leading a meeting with candidates and team members in a conference room, discussing hiring decisions for a team of 10 to 20 engineers.

Essential Factors in Engineering Manager Hiring at 10–20 Engineers

Stage-Specific Role Clarity Versus Generic Leadership

Role Dimension10–20 Engineer RealityGeneric Job Description (Wrong)
Coding involvement20–40% code reviews, architecture, critical fixes"Manages team, no coding required"
Team sizeDirectly manages 4–8 engineers"Manages engineering org"
Process maturitySets up first sprints, on-call, incident response"Improves existing processes"
Hiring participationSources/screens/closes 1–2 engineers/quarter"Oversees recruiting strategy"
Product management interfaceWorks with 1–2 PMs on roadmap"Partners with exec leadership"

Must-have competencies:

  • Managed 5–10 person engineering teams
  • Built engineering practices from scratch
  • Enough technical credibility to review architecture
  • Hired/onboarded at least 3 engineers in the past

Avoid:

  • Candidates with only big-company management experience
  • Anyone removed from IC work for 2+ years

Scaling Team Structures and Technical Leads

StructureWhen to UseManager Responsibilities
Flat (all ICs to EM)Single product, low complexityAll 1:1s, performance reviews, tech decisions
One technical leadStarting to specialize, 12+ engineers1:1s with TL + 4–6 ICs, delegate code review/sprint planning
Two technical leads15+ engineers, multiple streams1:1s with TLs + senior ICs, cross-team alignment/hiring

Candidate evaluation signals:

  • Has set up tech leads before, not just inherited them
  • Can explain when flat structure stops working
  • Gets that tech lead is a growth path, not a separate IC ladder

Red flags: Wants formal reporting layers right away, or never worked without them.

Engineering Talent: Sourcing, Evaluation, and Constraints

Sourcing expectations:

  • 3–5 hours/week sourcing (LinkedIn, GitHub, referrals)
  • Keeps 10–15 warm contacts in pipeline
  • Converts 30%+ of referrals from screen to offer
  • Closes senior hires even with 10–20% comp gaps by selling the role/growth
Evaluation AreaAssessment MethodPass Threshold
Technical depthLive code/system design reviewSpots 3+ arch issues in 30 min
Culture fitTeam interview (3–4 engineers)3/4 positive votes, with notes
Ramp timePast onboarding plansHas 30/60/90 day plans from past
Specialization matchPortfolio vs. stack gaps60%+ overlap with needs

Common constraints:

  • Small recruiting budget = more manager sourcing
  • Can’t match big tech comp on cash
  • Equity value is fuzzy without recent growth/funding
  • Team too small for lots of specialists

Red flag: Expects recruiters to do all sourcing or can’t explain how they’d build a pipeline.

Execution Leverage: Operational Methods, Decision Models, and Trade-Offs for 10–20 Engineer Teams

β˜•Get Codeinated

Wake Up Your Tech Knowledge

Join 40,000 others and get Codeinated in 5 minutes. The free weekly email that wakes up your tech knowledge. Five minutes. Every week. No drowsiness. Five minutes. No drowsiness.

Hiring Timelines, Budget Planning, and Resource Allocation

ActivityTimelineOwner
Headcount planning90 days pre-quarterSr. Eng Manager + Finance
Role definition/approval30–45 daysEng Manager + CTO
Recruiting/screening30–60 daysEng Manager + Recruiter
Offer to start14–30 daysHR + Eng Manager

Resource Allocation:

  • New product: 40–50%
  • Data/platform: 20–30%
  • Ops/continuous improvement: 20–30%

Budget Trade-Offs:

  • Hire specialists (ex: data eng) = faster, but 15–25% more expensive
  • Automate (data pipelines): 200–400 hrs up front, 30–40% less ops work per quarter
  • Contractors: Faster (14 days vs. 60), but 40–60% pricier overall
Automation ROI ExampleSetup TimeMonthly Savings per Engineer
CI/CD pipeline160 hours8–12 hours

Project Management, Agile Processes, and Automation Adoption

Process Component10–15 Engineers15–20 Engineers
Sprint length2 weeks2 weeks
Planning cadenceSprint-basedSprint + quarterly roadmap
StandupsTeam-wide, 15 minPod-based, 10 min + weekly sync
RetrospectivesPer sprintPer sprint + monthly cross-team

Tooling checklist:

  • Issue tracking: Jira, Linear, etc.
  • Roadmap: Quarterly, with dependencies
  • Capacity: Track per engineer
  • Analytics: Burndown, velocity, cycle time
Automation AreaImpactCostPriority
CI/CD pipelinesHighMedium1
Data quality checksHighLow1
Infra provisioningMediumHigh2
Analytics dashboardsMediumLow2
Advanced analytics autoLowHigh3

Agile Methodology Selection Rules:

  • Rule: Co-located teams β†’ fewer ceremonies. Example: Standups only, monthly retro.
  • Rule: Early-stage product β†’ weekly pivots. Example: Weekly sprint planning.
  • Rule: Regulated industry β†’ compliance gates at sprint end. Example: Security review before release.
Operational Excellence RuleExample
70% confidence ruleShip when you know 2–3x more than you don't

Cross-Functional Teams and Design Decision Governance

Decision TypeAuthorityInputTimeline
System architectureSr. Eng ManagerTech leads, data eng2–4 weeks
Service designTech LeadTeam engineers1 week
Data schema/modelingData Eng LeadAnalytics, PM1–2 weeks
Tool selection ($0–10K)Eng ManagerFinance1 week
Tool selection ($10K+)Sr. Eng ManagerCTO, finance2–3 weeks

Cross-Functional Touchpoints:

β˜•Get Codeinated

Wake Up Your Tech Knowledge

Join 40,000 others and get Codeinated in 5 minutes. The free weekly email that wakes up your tech knowledge. Five minutes. Every week. No drowsiness. Five minutes. No drowsiness.

  • Product: Eng reviews specs at 70% done (not 100%)
  • Data: Data eng sets SLOs with analytics
  • Strategy: Sr. eng managers join quarterly business planning
Failure ModeSymptomGuardrail
Scope creepProject overruns by >30%Formal change control post-plan
Unclear ownershipDecisions stuck >1 weekRACI matrix per project
Over-engineeringTime to market >2x estimateCost-benefit review at design
Poor data infraData pipeline fails >5% of runsData quality in team OKRs

Engineering Excellence Standards

Review TypeRequirement
Code reviewAll changes, <24 hour turnaround
Design reviewRequired for changes to >2 services/data models
Security reviewRequired for auth, data access, or PII changes

Frequently Asked Questions

Teams with 10-20 engineers hit some tricky hiring and management questions - stuff like, when do you need a manager, how many reports is too many, and what makes someone actually qualified to lead? The right answer depends a lot on how mature your team is, how gnarly the tech stack gets, and what the company’s shooting for.

What are the key factors to consider when deciding to hire an engineering manager for a team of 10-20 engineers?

Main things to look at:

  • Manager-to-engineer ratio: If you’ve got 10+ engineers and no manager, expect communication bottlenecks and career development to stall out.
  • Technical complexity: Projects that cross teams or need architecture guidance pretty much demand a manager.
  • Growth plans: If you’ll have 15+ engineers in 6 months, get a manager before you scale.
  • Founder/CTO bandwidth: Managing 10+ direct reports eats up 60-80% of a technical leader’s week with 1-on-1s and performance reviews.

Management necessity indicators:

IndicatorThreshold
Direct reports per leader8-10+ engineers
Weekly 1-on-1 time required6+ hours
Cross-team dependencies3+ teams to coordinate
Performance issues unaddressed30+ days
Career development requestsBacklog of 4+ promotions

If you see 3 or more of these, you need an engineering manager within 30-60 days.

What is the optimal number of direct reports for an engineering manager to effectively lead their team?

Span of control by context:

Team TypeOptimal RangeMaximum
High-growth startup5-78
Established product6-810
Mature organization7-1012
Mixed seniority team4-67
All senior engineers8-1012

Managers with 5-8 direct reports usually keep up with coaching, tech reviews, and planning.

Typical weekly time split (for 8 reports):

  • 1-on-1s & career development: 8-10 hours
  • Team meetings: 5-7 hours
  • Hiring: 4-6 hours
  • Tech reviews: 3-5 hours
  • Performance management: 2-4 hours

Rule β†’ Example:
If a manager has more than 10 direct reports, they lose time for technical strategy.
Example: A manager with 12 reports spends nearly all week on meetings, missing key architecture reviews.

What qualifications and level of experience should a candidate have for an engineering manager role?

Minimum qualifications for 10-20 engineer teams:

  • Technical: 5+ years as IC, 2+ years at senior level
  • Management: 1-2 years leading 3+ engineers, or 6-12 months leading 5+
  • System design: Owned architecture for mid/large systems
  • Hiring: Done 10+ interviews, hired at least 3

Experience requirements by team context:

Team ContextTechnical DepthManagement Experience
Greenfield productStaff+ level1+ year managing 4+ engineers
Legacy system3+ years in stack2+ years managing 5+
High-growth scalingSenior+ with scaling18+ months in hypergrowth
Technical transformationPrincipal/Staff engineer2+ years managing tech debt

Red flags:

  • No experience with senior engineers
  • Never made a termination call
  • Can’t explain technical tradeoffs from past projects
  • No examples of handling performance conflicts

Rule β†’ Example:
First-time managers need 3-6 months of close coaching and should start with just 3-5 direct reports.
Example: A new manager with 8 reports often struggles; keep it small at first.

How does team size impact the decision-making process within the engineering department?

Decision-making by team size:

Team SizeDecision ModelApproval LayersConsensus Requirement
10-12 engineersManager + tech lead partnership1-2Technical decisions only
13-15 engineersManager owns, delegates tech2Architecture & hiring
16-20 engineersManager coordinates, leads decide2-3Strategic direction only

Who decides what:

  • Manager: team structure, performance, hiring, resources
  • Tech leads: architecture, standards, code review, deployments
  • Team: implementation, tooling, sprint planning, on-call
  • Executive approval: headcount, comp out of band, major platform shifts

Common failure modes:

  • Manager makes all technical calls (bottleneck)
  • Manager hands off all people stuff (accountability gap)
  • Team consensus on hiring (slows hiring by 2-3x)
  • Tech lead overrides manager on team structure (dual reporting mess)

Rule β†’ Example:
If a team grows from 10 to 20 engineers but keeps the same decision structure, decision speed drops by 40-60%.
Example: A 10-person team makes architecture calls in a week; a 20-person team without new delegation takes three weeks.

β˜•Get Codeinated

Wake Up Your Tech Knowledge

Join 40,000 others and get Codeinated in 5 minutes. The free weekly email that wakes up your tech knowledge. Five minutes. Every week. No drowsiness. Five minutes. No drowsiness.